Abstract Algebra, Dummit & Foote
Contents
- Group theory
- Definitions
- Preliminary theorems
- Isomorphism theorems
- Definitions
- Ring theory
- Field theory
Group theory
Definitions
Let be a group. The normalizer (in G) of a subset , denoted , is defined as In other words, if , , then .
Preliminary theorems
Let be a homomorphism. Let . Then ; i.e., the homomorphic pullback of a subgroup is a subgroup.
Let . Since is a homomorphism, consequently, Therefore, so So
The prior proposition holds if "subgroup" is replaced by "normal subgroup."
Suppose Write For any let Then since and so Consequently, so
The kernel of a homomorphism is a normal subgroup.
Isomorphism theorems
First Isomorphism Theorem If is a homomorphism of groups, then and
: already proven.
: Let be defined by is a homomorphism since To show that is injective, suppose that Then so Therefore
Second Isomorphism Theorem If and , then and
: is nonempty as Let . Write Then since
: is nonempty by assumption. Let Then since
: is nonempty as Let Then since and since and Hence
: We use the First Isomorphism Theorem. To this end, we construct a homomorphism whose kernel is
Define is a homomorphism since Further,
Ring theory
Let be a commutative ring with ideal . is a maximal ideal if and only if is a field.
Insert proof here
Field theory
Let be a field. Let be an ideal of Then is or
Suppose . is a field, so . is an ideal, so , and consequently for any , so .
Let be a homomorphism of fields. Then is either identically or injective.
is an ideal of .
The following theorem is due to Kronecker. It represents the nucleus of his attempt to set down the theory of irrational numbers on a solid foundation.
Fundamental Theorem of Field Theory Let be a field and let be an irreducible polynomial. Then there exists an extension field of in which has a root.
Let We assert a few things about :
is a field. This is because is irreducible, so is maximal in .
is an extension field of . Pithily, is the field of constants of .
To be picky about it, consider the map given by This is the restriction to of the canonical quotient map . Like all canonical quotient maps, is a homomorphism of rings, so , its restriction to the field , is a homomorphism of fields.
Because is irreducible, and hence not , . So is not identically zero. Therefore it is injective, and hence an iso-morphism, by the prior proposition. Hence is contained isomorphically in as its field of constants.
contains a root of . Pithily, this is
More specifically, since is a homomorphism, we have This proof looks like a magic trick. I don't pick up where the mathematical subtlety is hidden. This is the cool thing and the irritating thing about textbook mathematics; it is done so elegantly that it looks fake.